shyammonk

My friend, Madguy had this interesting clarity that genetics is still process – great grandparents or whatever number of generations before's processes. Process or environment is still enough to explain intelligence if one really has to include genetics.

But is there really any evidence on genetics and intelligence or even genetics on physical aspects where a person's effort matters? Musical intelligence – sons and daughters of musicians.

Health – if son doesn't exercise, what use is his father's wwf background? While a 56 kg can be called healthier or even better than someone who got it 'big and thick' from his genetics. Bruce lee. Afterall to break an egg you don't need a bulldozer.

At the same time, though one may have to accept the impact early childhood and facing problems different from their peers. This has been told as a common factor for creative individuals.

If i didn't have a caring family, if i felt i was not enough, naturally i would find my heart desiring for approval which could come in the form of fame. This maybe enough drive to improve the skill required for the fame. Even if someone were to say spiritually follow the heart (well the deeper spiritual changes happen unconscious anyway) when you are alive on earth, naturally the heart will show towards the lacking which needs to be filled. Finally it all looks as if lacking leads to skill and fame (or skillless somehow fame)!

Early childhood stretches your brain to solve or just to place yourself in the whole confusing mess called the world where one is put into as a baby. Some get it really stretched and from then on they may have a real advantage over anyone else who wants to be 'like them'.

The inner world is a very intimate thing which cannot be taught. But one can know it because it is always one's property. Just need to quieten and listen though. Thapas .

No related posts.